I was reading a rant by Sarah Hoyt, a rant that's hard to summarize because when she gets going she really gets going, but I came across this:
'...look, “respect” is almost exclusively a liberal word. Usually used in the sense of “respect the office” or “respect me because I have this credential.” When speaking to a blogger or a writer, a conservative/libertarian is more likely to use “I’ve always admired” you.'
I sat upright, puzzling over this, unsure why this might be so, but thinking "Yes, I'm far more likely to write 'admired,' not 'respected,' in that sort of sentence."
So I googled for discussions on the difference shades of meaning, and came across this:
You would have respect for a person in authority- like a policeman, a military officer with a rank above your own, or a teacher, but you may not like that person so you might not admire them.
Isn't there a tendency to respect your adversaries but admire your friends?
There's something rather fussy about a lot of contemporary liberalism, an i-dotting, t-crossing concern with following protocol. You don't really admire someone for being good at following protocol, do you? But you can respect their ability to do so.
And now I will stop attempting to dissect
the difference between admire and respect.
Friday, October 31, 2014
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Maher vs. Students
Some students at Berkeley are trying to stop Bill Maher from speaking at the Berkeley commencement this year. He has made some pointed statements about what most Muslims believe, statements that have aroused these students' ire.
So far, Berkeley has not rescinded its invitation.
Patrick Popehat writes, perhaps with a trollish spirit:
"If you want to shut down Bill Maher’s hate speech against Muslims, why not invite him to a post-address debate, against your best and brightest? You’re well educated young men and women."
Please. I would pay to watch that.
But hopefully I could see
the whole thing on YouTube for free.
So far, Berkeley has not rescinded its invitation.
Patrick Popehat writes, perhaps with a trollish spirit:
"If you want to shut down Bill Maher’s hate speech against Muslims, why not invite him to a post-address debate, against your best and brightest? You’re well educated young men and women."
Please. I would pay to watch that.
But hopefully I could see
the whole thing on YouTube for free.
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Mann and Kaufmann
I'm reading Thomas Mann's long novel, The Magic Mountain, for our reconstituted book club. I got to wondering what my favorite German-American writer, Walter Kaufmann, might have said about Mann.
Kaufmann wrote a lot of appreciation and criticism for 20th century German literature.
But for the life of me I haven't found anything substantial.
Mann did supply a glowing blurb for Kaufmann's book on Nietzsche. And I think they may both have been living in Princeton, New Jersey at one point. It looks like Princeton U. has some of Mann's papers and most of Kaufmann's.
With a bond of culture and speech,
I wonder if they were friends.
But for now I fear I have reached
a research dead end.
Kaufmann wrote a lot of appreciation and criticism for 20th century German literature.
But for the life of me I haven't found anything substantial.
Mann did supply a glowing blurb for Kaufmann's book on Nietzsche. And I think they may both have been living in Princeton, New Jersey at one point. It looks like Princeton U. has some of Mann's papers and most of Kaufmann's.
With a bond of culture and speech,
I wonder if they were friends.
But for now I fear I have reached
a research dead end.
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
Train Meets Truck
Not far from here, today, in Northwest Indiana, a Chicago-bound Amtrak train hit a tractor-trailer rig carrying cement powder.
Great pictures of the truck ripped in two, and the train covered in powder, at the link. Nobody was seriously injured.
The truck driver "told authorities he saw the oncoming train but pulled into its path anyway because he thought he had time to clear the tracks."
If you misjudge the speed of a train,
You may have a lot you need to explain.
Great pictures of the truck ripped in two, and the train covered in powder, at the link. Nobody was seriously injured.
The truck driver "told authorities he saw the oncoming train but pulled into its path anyway because he thought he had time to clear the tracks."
If you misjudge the speed of a train,
You may have a lot you need to explain.
Monday, October 27, 2014
No Costume Needed
If you want to be even scarier
this Halloween
tell people you're a carrier
escaped from quarantine.
It might work better yet
if you first work up a sweat.
this Halloween
tell people you're a carrier
escaped from quarantine.
It might work better yet
if you first work up a sweat.
Sunday, October 26, 2014
Reflections on Gifts
They said Mozart's talents were merely inherited,
Unfairly come by, and not strictly merited.
They let out an envious wail and bemoaned it.
But Mozart just practiced his gift like he owned it.
Unfairly come by, and not strictly merited.
They let out an envious wail and bemoaned it.
But Mozart just practiced his gift like he owned it.
Corruption In The Social Sciences
Charles Murray, reflecting after 20 years on the reception accorded to the book he co-wrote about intelligence:
'I’m also thinking of all the other social scientists who have come up to me over the years and told me what a wonderful book “The Bell Curve” is. But they never said it publicly. So corruption is one thing that ails the social sciences. Cowardice is another.'
I've never read the whole book. I've read chunks of it at the library. As he says in this interview, the book doesn't take a strong position on the nature/nurture debate. But he clearly expects that some part of what's going on is biological inheritance. And saying that there's anything on the nature side at all, is hazardous.
I'm not really a big fan of the man. He says: "None of us has earned our IQ." This is said by way of rolling around to justifying redistribution.
None of us has earned our eye color, either. It's not the sort of thing you earn. It's more like a gift. And here's the thing about gifts. You may not have earned them, but once you receive them, you do rightly own them.
What talents you have, do not hide them.
Even if others deride them.
'I’m also thinking of all the other social scientists who have come up to me over the years and told me what a wonderful book “The Bell Curve” is. But they never said it publicly. So corruption is one thing that ails the social sciences. Cowardice is another.'
I've never read the whole book. I've read chunks of it at the library. As he says in this interview, the book doesn't take a strong position on the nature/nurture debate. But he clearly expects that some part of what's going on is biological inheritance. And saying that there's anything on the nature side at all, is hazardous.
I'm not really a big fan of the man. He says: "None of us has earned our IQ." This is said by way of rolling around to justifying redistribution.
None of us has earned our eye color, either. It's not the sort of thing you earn. It's more like a gift. And here's the thing about gifts. You may not have earned them, but once you receive them, you do rightly own them.
What talents you have, do not hide them.
Even if others deride them.
The Mysterious Creation of Jobs
Hillary Clinton, the other day:
"Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs."
So who creates jobs, in point of fact?
Should we say: The Invisible Hand?
Or something abstract
Like Supply and Demand?
No, it's herself:
"I voted to raise the minimum wage and guess what, millions of jobs were created or paid better and more families were secure."
No one's too sure where those millions of jobs are that she created. They're not in the employment statistics.
Somewhere there's gobs
Of shiny new jobs.
But that isn't here
Or anywhere near.
"Don’t let anybody tell you that it’s corporations and businesses that create jobs."
So who creates jobs, in point of fact?
Should we say: The Invisible Hand?
Or something abstract
Like Supply and Demand?
No, it's herself:
"I voted to raise the minimum wage and guess what, millions of jobs were created or paid better and more families were secure."
No one's too sure where those millions of jobs are that she created. They're not in the employment statistics.
Somewhere there's gobs
Of shiny new jobs.
But that isn't here
Or anywhere near.
Friday, October 24, 2014
White Men
Jaltcoh, himself a white man, writes:
"Everyone knows that men and whites have historically gotten a lot of unfair advantages, and it's a serious problem. I just think that if your solution to that problem is to endorse the concept of sexism and racism (as long as they're directed against the right people), you lose a bit of credibility to claim that you're fundamentally opposed to sexism and racism."
If you must hate someone, the right men
are white men,
and maybe for a little extra hate,
go for those who are overweight.
If you limit your hate to just this safe selection,
you may escape Political Correction.
"Everyone knows that men and whites have historically gotten a lot of unfair advantages, and it's a serious problem. I just think that if your solution to that problem is to endorse the concept of sexism and racism (as long as they're directed against the right people), you lose a bit of credibility to claim that you're fundamentally opposed to sexism and racism."
If you must hate someone, the right men
are white men,
and maybe for a little extra hate,
go for those who are overweight.
If you limit your hate to just this safe selection,
you may escape Political Correction.
Thursday, October 23, 2014
R J Hollingdale on Thomas Mann
Today I was reading Hollingdale's book on Thomas Mann, and realized I had no idea what Hollingdale had looked like, or who he was exactly.
Well, here he is:

To summarize from Wikipedia, he left school at 16 (in 1946 or so) to become a journalist, learned German in private lessons, and became an influential scholar of modern German thought. Without a degree.
Impressive.
Hollingdale sees Mann as caught up in God-is-dead nihilism.
"The whole world of Thomas Mann's fiction is erected on this basis of no values. It is because this world has no values that the major novels are so long (no principle of selection); it is because it has no values that its ideological tendency is so uncertain (no instinctive moral judgment); it is because it has no values that its most valuable inhabitant, the artist, is inverted into a decadent and criminal (the identity of the best and the worst); it is because it has no values that it is seen ironically (self-defence against the meaningless); it is because it has no values that it resorts to mythology (an attempt to create value);it is because it has no values that its only reality is physical reality and its only causes physical causes, and when it tries to account for the fact that it has no values it seeks the explanation in physiology. But because the world which this fictional world seeks to mirror really has no values, this fictional world is a true mirror and the image it reflects a true image. The aesthetic faults we have discovered in it, which are true faults, are thus in the long run faults in the subject which it reflects. Or, as the mirror replied to the monster: 'There is nothing wrong with me, it is you who are distorted'."
Rather sweeping, but makes more sense
than lots of what I've seen dispensed.
Well, here he is:

To summarize from Wikipedia, he left school at 16 (in 1946 or so) to become a journalist, learned German in private lessons, and became an influential scholar of modern German thought. Without a degree.
Impressive.
Hollingdale sees Mann as caught up in God-is-dead nihilism.
"The whole world of Thomas Mann's fiction is erected on this basis of no values. It is because this world has no values that the major novels are so long (no principle of selection); it is because it has no values that its ideological tendency is so uncertain (no instinctive moral judgment); it is because it has no values that its most valuable inhabitant, the artist, is inverted into a decadent and criminal (the identity of the best and the worst); it is because it has no values that it is seen ironically (self-defence against the meaningless); it is because it has no values that it resorts to mythology (an attempt to create value);it is because it has no values that its only reality is physical reality and its only causes physical causes, and when it tries to account for the fact that it has no values it seeks the explanation in physiology. But because the world which this fictional world seeks to mirror really has no values, this fictional world is a true mirror and the image it reflects a true image. The aesthetic faults we have discovered in it, which are true faults, are thus in the long run faults in the subject which it reflects. Or, as the mirror replied to the monster: 'There is nothing wrong with me, it is you who are distorted'."
Rather sweeping, but makes more sense
than lots of what I've seen dispensed.
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
50 Shades of Worry
I haven't read 50 Shades Of Grey.
I did make a reference to it in a play.
Anyway, I saw gossip today about the movie, which is reportedly due out in 4 months. They're reshooting some of the love scenes.
"A source who works on the set told Us Magazine the original shots weren't passionate and the directors were disappointed by the stars' lack of chemistry.'"
Funny thing about chemistry. You can suspend disbelief about all kinds of practical things. But in a love story you really need to sense some mutual attraction.
If you can't feel the sizzle,
the film is bound to fizzle.
I did make a reference to it in a play.
Anyway, I saw gossip today about the movie, which is reportedly due out in 4 months. They're reshooting some of the love scenes.
"A source who works on the set told Us Magazine the original shots weren't passionate and the directors were disappointed by the stars' lack of chemistry.'"
Funny thing about chemistry. You can suspend disbelief about all kinds of practical things. But in a love story you really need to sense some mutual attraction.
If you can't feel the sizzle,
the film is bound to fizzle.
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
Appearance Alteration
As the Daily Mail asks:
What HAS Renee Zellweger done to her face? Bridget actress looks utterly unrecognisable as she steps out with her boyfriend in LA
Rather striking pictures at the link. You can see it's her, more from the side than from the front.
Maybe she's going into Witness Protection,
but it must be strange to stare at your own reflection,
and see a face beyond your recollection.
What HAS Renee Zellweger done to her face? Bridget actress looks utterly unrecognisable as she steps out with her boyfriend in LA
Rather striking pictures at the link. You can see it's her, more from the side than from the front.
Maybe she's going into Witness Protection,
but it must be strange to stare at your own reflection,
and see a face beyond your recollection.
Monday, October 20, 2014
Quatrain on Haiku
Haiku - they're from the Japanese
whose poets used to strive
to write in lines of snappy threes
composed of 5-7-5.
whose poets used to strive
to write in lines of snappy threes
composed of 5-7-5.
Illness Paradox
I have a cold. It's better now. I had it really bad over the weekend, yet my Sunday was very productive, writing-wise. I finished the first act of my new play and gave it a new title: All Mixed Up.
I've noticed, over the years, that certain types of "feeling miserable" are highly compatible with getting work done, particularly creative-thinking type work, whether it's writing a story or writing a computer program. What seems paradoxical is that I feel very low energy, feel very unmotivated, feel like my concentration is limited... but then I get a lot done in an intense state of focus.
I wonder if part of it is that I'm so much less distractable, so I stay focused and the problem becomes more tractable.
This would include less distraction by the meta-level, the perfectionistic sort of questioning that distracts by constant asking: but is that right?
Instead I plod along
not worrying if I'm wrong.
I guess the difficult trick
is being the right degree of sick.
I've noticed, over the years, that certain types of "feeling miserable" are highly compatible with getting work done, particularly creative-thinking type work, whether it's writing a story or writing a computer program. What seems paradoxical is that I feel very low energy, feel very unmotivated, feel like my concentration is limited... but then I get a lot done in an intense state of focus.
I wonder if part of it is that I'm so much less distractable, so I stay focused and the problem becomes more tractable.
This would include less distraction by the meta-level, the perfectionistic sort of questioning that distracts by constant asking: but is that right?
Instead I plod along
not worrying if I'm wrong.
I guess the difficult trick
is being the right degree of sick.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Left to Right
Back when I was in high school a friend told me that the ancient Greeks, at one point, had written both left to right AND right to left, alternately. You can see where this would be efficient for speed reading. Scholars call it "boustrophedon", which means "ox-turning", as when you plow a field with an ox, and you turn and go back the other way, still plowing.
The individual characters are mirrored, like Leonardo Da Vinci's famous "code". I actually taught myself to do this, also in high school. Maybe I had too much time on my hands in high school!
Recently I read that it was boustrophedon that accounts for the transition from Right-to-Left to Left-to-Right writing! The Semitic languages (such as Hebrew, Arabic, Phoenician) are all Right-to-Left. The Greeks took their alphabet from the Phoenicians.
'Greek was originally written predominantly from right to left, just like Phoenician, but scribes could freely alternate between directions. For a time, a writing style with alternating right-to-left and left-to-right lines (called boustrophedon, literally "ox-turning", after the manner of an ox ploughing a field) was common, until in the classical period the left-to-right writing direction became the norm.'
But... while that explains the ability to shift readily,
it doesn't explain why they chose Left-to-Right steadily.
I think
it was commanded
because Left-to-Right is better when working with ink,
at least for the right-handed.
The individual characters are mirrored, like Leonardo Da Vinci's famous "code". I actually taught myself to do this, also in high school. Maybe I had too much time on my hands in high school!
Recently I read that it was boustrophedon that accounts for the transition from Right-to-Left to Left-to-Right writing! The Semitic languages (such as Hebrew, Arabic, Phoenician) are all Right-to-Left. The Greeks took their alphabet from the Phoenicians.
'Greek was originally written predominantly from right to left, just like Phoenician, but scribes could freely alternate between directions. For a time, a writing style with alternating right-to-left and left-to-right lines (called boustrophedon, literally "ox-turning", after the manner of an ox ploughing a field) was common, until in the classical period the left-to-right writing direction became the norm.'
But... while that explains the ability to shift readily,
it doesn't explain why they chose Left-to-Right steadily.
I think
it was commanded
because Left-to-Right is better when working with ink,
at least for the right-handed.
Saturday, October 18, 2014
Lone Star State of Anxiety
Guess where my wife is this weekend:
"Jenkins said this is a critical weekend for Dallas. Statistically speaking, this weekend is the weekend people would start showing symptoms if they had contracted the virus, he said."
The story mentions that a Dallas bus and train station was briefly closed today on a false alarm. The story says county officials are getting "several calls an hour". May they all prove unfounded.
Come back, my dear,
from the land of fear,
and enjoy
Illinois -
no cases here!
"Jenkins said this is a critical weekend for Dallas. Statistically speaking, this weekend is the weekend people would start showing symptoms if they had contracted the virus, he said."
The story mentions that a Dallas bus and train station was briefly closed today on a false alarm. The story says county officials are getting "several calls an hour". May they all prove unfounded.
Come back, my dear,
from the land of fear,
and enjoy
Illinois -
no cases here!
Friday, October 17, 2014
Czar
There is nothing like a czar
to bring me peace of mind.
Whatever my worries are,
they all get left behind,
knowing that concentration
of power has taken place,
knowing that this great nation
can look to a single face.
His noble words will inspire us,
no matter how sick we may be.
Who better to fight a virus
than a man with a law degree?
to bring me peace of mind.
Whatever my worries are,
they all get left behind,
knowing that concentration
of power has taken place,
knowing that this great nation
can look to a single face.
His noble words will inspire us,
no matter how sick we may be.
Who better to fight a virus
than a man with a law degree?
Don't Cry About Us, Venezuela
It's a sad situation in the people's paradise:
"Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Thursday blamed Washington for the slump in global oil prices."
As far as I can tell, Washington had precious little to do with us "flooding the market". The action was in the states and in private enterprise.
Your oil profits are lacking?
Frightfully sorry for fracking!
"Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Thursday blamed Washington for the slump in global oil prices."
As far as I can tell, Washington had precious little to do with us "flooding the market". The action was in the states and in private enterprise.
Your oil profits are lacking?
Frightfully sorry for fracking!
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Odds
At this point you're more likely to get hit by a thunderbolt
than to catch that disease that's so frightening.
But there's zero chance of incompetence causing
a national outbreak of lightning.
than to catch that disease that's so frightening.
But there's zero chance of incompetence causing
a national outbreak of lightning.
Wednesday, October 15, 2014
In Praise of Intransigience
I was looking at a new book, In Praise of Intransigience: the perils of flexibility, by Richard H. Weisberg.
First off, let me say, ethical and legal intransigience, which is what he is talking about, is certainly deserving of some praise. Flexibility cannot be an infinite virtue, since at some point it falls prey to some mind-bending recursive questions, such as:
Aren't you being rather inflexible in your idealization of flexibility? Wouldn't true flexibility allow for intransigience, too?
It's an oddly structured book. Much time is spent on the epistles of Paul, the gospel of John, and the Nazi-appeasing governments of Vichy France and the occupied Channel Islands.
He traces flexibility-idealization back to early Christianity and the rhetorical strategies adopted in its divorce from Judaism. This strikes me as novel and misguided, but I haven't taken the time to study his thesis.
Of course, he has a pressing interest in the question: how did the Europeans go along, so flexibly, with the horror of murderous Nazi antisemitism? So you can see where he might be tempted to take this issue back to the early split between the 2 religions.
What house will stand
when built upon sand?
First off, let me say, ethical and legal intransigience, which is what he is talking about, is certainly deserving of some praise. Flexibility cannot be an infinite virtue, since at some point it falls prey to some mind-bending recursive questions, such as:
Aren't you being rather inflexible in your idealization of flexibility? Wouldn't true flexibility allow for intransigience, too?
It's an oddly structured book. Much time is spent on the epistles of Paul, the gospel of John, and the Nazi-appeasing governments of Vichy France and the occupied Channel Islands.
He traces flexibility-idealization back to early Christianity and the rhetorical strategies adopted in its divorce from Judaism. This strikes me as novel and misguided, but I haven't taken the time to study his thesis.
Of course, he has a pressing interest in the question: how did the Europeans go along, so flexibly, with the horror of murderous Nazi antisemitism? So you can see where he might be tempted to take this issue back to the early split between the 2 religions.
What house will stand
when built upon sand?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)