There's an exercise I go through after I write a long story, such as a play. I go back and look at the notes and early versions it evolved from.
Often I am surprised.
I just did it for this new thing I've written, and, sure enough, I was surprised. It somehow evolved out of 2 quite different abandoned story attempts, the first involving an encrypted laptop, and the second involving a private school. The main thing these 2 attempts had in common - was that they both involved a lawyer. The thing I finally wrote ended up involving 4 lawyers, so I guess I had lawyers on the brain. Well, I have 4 close relatives who are lawyers, so perhaps I can be forgiven for that.
I had completely forgotten that the immediate impetus for Start Number 3, the start which I carried to completion, was an article in the Chicago Tribune on February 20th this year:
Heavy-equipment operator Mark Michelsen, 49, is threatening to rip up or fill in the subdivision detention pond he unwittingly bought for $11 at a tax sale if the village or homeowners don't pay up.I found the article fascinating, but I didn't actually use the story in the article, although my story did end up involving a legal dispute over a pond.
Funny how going back to replay the tape
to see the way a story really took shape
is so often an exercise
in surprise.
No comments:
Post a Comment